Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Balistreri-Amrhein v. Universal Insurance Company of North America et al
as 4:2023cv00901
Defendant:
American Technologies, Inc., Universal Insurance Company of North America, Chief Judge Brenda Rhoades and others
Plaintiff:
Darlene C Balistreri-Amrhein
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Balistreri-Amrhein v. Larry Hercules & Law Firm, et al et al
as 4:2023cv00862
Plaintiff:
Darlene C. Balistreri-Amrhein
Defendant:
Larry Hercules & Law Firm, et al, Megan Adeyemo, Roy Mathews and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Balistreri-Amrhein, et al v. Universal Insurance Company of North America, et al
as 4:2023cv00776
Defendant:
CEO Gary Moore, Universal Insurance Company of North America, Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO) and others
Plaintiff:
Darlene C. Balistreri-Amrhein
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jose Hercules v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 20-60658
Petitioner:
Jose Alberto Hercules, also known as Jose Hercules Guillen
Respondent:
William P. Barr, U. S. Attorney General
Ana Hercules-Quiteno, et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-60630
Petitioner:
ANA LAURA HERCULES-QUITENO and CHRISTOPHER DANIEL TORRES-HERCULES
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Howard v. Hercules Offshore, Inc.'s Insurance Plan
as 2:2013cv00140
Plaintiff:
Damon Howard
Defendant:
Hercules Offshore, Inc.'s Insurance Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
USA v. Hercules Incorporated, et al
as 12-51232
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Movant - Appellant:
CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, Attorney for Proposed Intervenor ConocoPhillips Company
Defendant - Appellee:
HERCULES INC and ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
