Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Wilson et al v. Austin III et al
as 4:2022cv00438
Plaintiff:
Joshua A Wilson, Members of the Armed Forces for Liberty, Michael Groothousen and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Scott Wells, Annmarie Acevedo, William Timothy Adams and others
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin III, Acting Commissioner Janet Woodcock, Xavier Becerra and others
Amicus Curiae:
Pritish Vora
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Gauch v. Carr
as 21-11165
Petitioner / Appellant:
Amber Dawn Gauch
Respondent / Appellee:
Michael Carr, Warden, FMC Carswell
Poff v. Carr
as 21-10991
Petitioner / Appellant:
Julia Ann Poff
Respondent / Appellee:
Michael Carr, Warden
Ellis-Erkkila v. USA
as 21-50828
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Priscilla Ann Ellis-Erkkila
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Poff v. Carr
as 21-10809
Petitioner / Appellant:
Julia Ann Poff
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden Michael Carr
Ellis v. Carr
as 21-10189
Petitioner / Appellant:
Priscilla Ellis
Respondent / Appellee:
Michael Carr, Warden, Federal Medical Center Carswell
Priscilla Ellis v. Michael Carr
as 20-10843
Respondent / Appellee:
Michael Carr, Warden, FMC-Carswell
Petitioner / Appellant:
Priscilla A. Ellis
Mark Marvin v. United States Bureau of Prison, et al
as 20-10690
Defendant / Appellee:
JANE DOE, KATHLEEN HAWK SAWYER, Director, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK MARVIN, and on behalf of Marjorie Marvin
Blanca Cantu v. Michael Carr, Warden
as 20-10441
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL CARR, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
BLANCA ESTELLA CANTU
Priscilla Ellis v. Eric Wilson, et al
as 20-10403
Defendant / Appellee:
COHEN, Federal Bureau of Prisons Associate Warden, FMC Carswell, WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, LUX, Federal Bureaux of Prisons Executive at FMC-Carswell, Individually and in their Official Capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PRISCILLA A. ELLIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
