Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00572
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00976
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Vicki Bates v. Monarch Dental Services
as 20-10046
Defendant / Appellee:
MONARCH DENTAL SERVICES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VICKI BATES
City of Dallas et al v. Topletz et al
as 3:2016cv01349
Plaintiff:
City of Dallas
Intervenor_plaintiff:
James Choice and Reneka Towers
Defendant:
Dennis Topletz , Casey Topletz , Vickie Topletz and others
Counter_claimant:
2603 Modree Ave., Dallas, Texas, In Rem , 2224 Cooper St., Dallas, Texas, In Rem , Dennis Topletz and others
Counter_defendant:
James Choice , City of Dallas and Reneka Towers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Monarch Investments, LLC v. Aurrecoechea et al
as 1:2014cv01019
Defendant:
Candice Aguirre, Alejandro Aurrecoechea, Fernando Aurrecoechea and others
Plaintiff:
Monarch Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Martinez v. Monarch Recovery Management, Inc.
as 5:2013cv00055
Plaintiff:
Rafael Martinez
Defendant:
Monarch Recovery Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfers
Safranek v. Monarch Recovery Management, Inc.
as 4:2012cv00022
Plaintiff:
Robyne Safranek
Defendant:
Monarch Recovery Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00390
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
