Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Terkel v. Ctr for Disease Control
as 21-40137
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Lakeridge Apartments, Limited, Lufkin Creekside Apartments, Limited, Lauren Terkel and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Norris Cochran, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, United States of America, Center for Disease Control and Prevention and others
Terkel et al v. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention et al
as 6:2020cv00564
Defendant:
Director Robert R. Redfield, ActingChief of Staff Nina Witkofsky, Secretary Alex Azar and others
Plaintiff:
Lauren Terkel, Lufkin Creekside Apartments, Ltd., Lufkin Creekside Apartments II, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Jay Fulmer, et al v. USA
as 19-30526
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAY HOLT FULMER and CHRISTINA MACDONALD
MacDonald v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00082
Plaintiff:
Darrell W MacDonald
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
MacDonald et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2016mc00088
Plaintiff:
Evelyn MacDonald and George MacDonald, Jr
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
MacDonald v. BP Oil
as 2:2016cv04141
Plaintiff:
Martin S. MacDonald
Defendant:
BP Oil
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Husseini v. Just Energy Group, Inc et al
as 4:2013mc01859
Plaintiff:
Maher Khalil Husseini
Defendant:
Just Energy Group, Inc and Rebbeca MacDonald
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv02275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities
MacDonald v. GC Services, LP
as 4:2010cv02779
Plaintiff:
Robert MacDonald
Defendant:
GC Services, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Jason MacDonald
as 09-41209
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JASON RAYMOND MACDONALD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
