Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Johnson v. Newburger et al
as 5:2024cv00863
Defendant:
Megan Hale, Helen Mosothoane, Manuel H. Newburger and others
Plaintiff:
John P. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Tarantino v. American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Megan Tarantino
Defendant:
American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Kelton v. Nordstrom
as 24-50002
Plaintiff:
Randall Kelton and Kara Bell
Defendant:
Nordstrom, Incorporated, doing business as Nordstrom Rack, Kelsie Fucci, Nathan Hecht and others
Madrigal et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2023cv01374
Plaintiff:
Juan Madrigal and Megan Madrigal
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Balistreri-Amrhein v. Universal Insurance Company of North America et al
as 4:2023cv00901
Defendant:
American Technologies, Inc., Universal Insurance Company of North America, Chief Judge Brenda Rhoades and others
Plaintiff:
Darlene C Balistreri-Amrhein
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Balistreri-Amrhein v. Larry Hercules & Law Firm, et al et al
as 4:2023cv00862
Plaintiff:
Darlene C. Balistreri-Amrhein
Defendant:
Larry Hercules & Law Firm, et al, Megan Adeyemo, Roy Mathews and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Reule v. Jackson
as 23-40478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christine Reule, Harriet Nicholson, Rebecca Alexander Foster and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Honorable Reeve Jackson, Penny Clarkston and Megan LaVoie
Crow et al v. General Motors LLC
as 3:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
James Crow and Megan Crow
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
The Mississippi Bar v. Patrick
as 3:2023ad00003
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Megan Mariah Patrick
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
