Other Statutes Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund v. Alta Mesa Resources, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv02982
Defendant: Jeffrey H. Tepper, Riverstone Investment Group LLC, Alta Mesa Resources, Inc. and others
Petitioner: Camelot Event Driven Fund, A Series of Frank Funds Trust
Plaintiff: FNY Managed Accounts, LLC, FNY Partners Fund LP, Paul J. Burbach, Jr. and others
Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund et al v. Republic Contractors Inc et al
as 5:2018mc00023
Plaintiff: Local 430 Plumbers & Pipefitters Health & Welfare Fund , Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund , Local 430 Plumbers & Pipefitters Annuity Fund and others
Defendant: Republic Contractors Inc and Curtiss Wright
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
City of Birmingham, et al v. Plains All American Pipeline,, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-20286
Plaintiff - Appellant: POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF DETROIT, IAM NATIONAL PENSION FUND, lead plaintiff, CITY OF WARREN POLICE & FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Defendant - Appellee: PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P., GREGORY L. ARMSTRONG, AL SWANSON and others
Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund et al v. Evans Brothers Plumbing and Heating LLC
as 5:2018mc00004
Plaintiff: Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund Trustees and International Training Fund Trustees
Defendant: Evans Brothers Plumbing & Heating L L C
Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund et al v. Cougar Company Plumbing Contractors
as 4:2017mc01364
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund and Trustees of the International Training Fund
Defendant: Cougar Company Plumbing Contractors
Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund v. Lindsay Mechanical, Inc.
as 1:2016mc00106
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund
Defendant: Lindsay Mechanical, Inc.
Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund et al v. Rayco Mechanical, Inc.
as 4:2015mc02951
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund and Trustees of the International Training Fund
Defendant: Rayco Mechanical, Inc.
Nemky v. Trinity Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv03537
Plaintiff: Thomas Nemky , Department of the Treasury of the State of New Jersey and its Division of Investment , City of Austin Retirement System and others
Respondent: Trinity Industries Inc , Timothy R Wallace and James E Perry
Movant: Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund and United Association Local Union Officers & Employees Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
City of Birmingham Firemen's and Policemen's Supplemental Pension System v. Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2015cv02404
Plaintiff: City of Birmingham Firemen's and Policemen's Supplemental Pension System, Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit, IAM National Pension Fund and others
Defendant: Plains All American Pipeline, L.P., Gregory L. Armstrong, Al Swanson and others
Consolidated Defendant: Plains GP Holdings L.P., Harry N. Pefanis, Victor Burk and others
Petitioner: Inter-Marketing Group USA, Inc., The Pennsylvania State Employees' Retirement System, Houston Municipal Employees Pension System and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Isolde v. Trinity Industries Inc et al
as 3:2015cv02093
Plaintiff: Richard J Isolde and City of Austin Retirement System
Defendant: Trinity Industries Inc , Timothy R Wallace and James E Perry
Movant: The Department of the Treasury of the State of New Jersey and its Division of Investment , Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund and United Association Local Union Officers & Employees Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?