Cases 1 - 10 of 138
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops et al v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al
as 2:2024cv00691
Petitioner:
National Council of Jewish Women, Legal Aid Society - Employment Law Center, American Federation of Teachers and others
Defendant:
CHARLOTTE BURROWS and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Plaintiff:
Catholic University of America, Society of the Roman Catholic Church of the Diocese of Lafayette, Society of the Roman Catholic Church of the Diocese of Lake Charles and others
Amicus Curiae:
Small Business Majority, Main Street Alliance and American Sustainable Business Council
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Garay v. Garland
as 24-60291
Petitioner:
Roman Fernando Garay
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Roman Jr. v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Roman Jr.
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
USA v. Palacios-De Paz
as 24-50212
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Raul Palacios-De Paz, also known as Luis Antonio Roman, also known as Bulmaro Palacios-De Paz, also known as Raul Palacios
Cacho v. Roman Financial Group LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Joshua Cacho
Defendant:
Roman Financial Group LLC and Norman R. Candelore, III
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Segundo Navarro Drilling, Ltd. v. San Roman Ranch Mineral Partners, Ltd.
as 5:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Segundo Navarro Drilling, Ltd.
Defendant:
San Roman Ranch Mineral Partners, Ltd.
USA v. Hernandez-Roman
as 22-51010
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Rodolfo Hernandez-Roman, also known as Rodolfo Hernandez Roman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
