Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Romero v. Kroger's Texas LP et al
as 4:2012cv03014
Plaintiff:
Joe Anthony Romero
Defendant:
Kroger's Texas LP, Sedgwick Claims Management Service, Phillips Akers and Womac and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pete Gonzalez v. Auto Zone, Inc., et al
as 12-20604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETE GONZALEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE BEUSSINK, Committee Chairperson, AZTEX ADVANTAGE, Autozone Texas Occupational Injury Benefit Plan, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INCORPORATED and others
Doucette v. Winn-Dixie Montgomery Leasing, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00241
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Doucette
Defendant:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., Winn-Dixie Montgomery Leasing, LLC, Winn-Dixie Montgomery, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Brewer v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00014
Plaintiff:
J. R. Brewer
Defendant:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. and Georgia-Pacific, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Manpower, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv00063
Plaintiff:
Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Manpower, Inc. , The Insurance Company of The State of Pennsylvania , Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzalez v. Auto Zone Inc et al
as 4:2009cv04054
Plaintiff:
Pete Gonzalez
Defendant:
Auto Zone Inc, Steve Beussink, Aztex Advantage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Davis v. Ascension Health et al
as 1:2009cv00885
Plaintiff:
Toni Davis and Toni Davis
Defendant:
Ascension Health and Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Martin v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv07142
Plaintiff:
Mary Martin
Defendant:
Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. and Sedgwick Claims Management Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
