Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Archer Daniels Midland Company, et al v. American Liberty M/T
as 2:2019cv10525
Plaintiff:
Archer Daniels Midland Company, American River Transportation Company, LLC and ADM International SARL
Defendant:
American Liberty M/T
Intervenor Plaintiff:
African Griffon Shipping Co. Ltd., Kevin Wright and Port of South Louisiana
Consolidated Petitioner:
Crowley Global Ship Management, Inc.
Intervenor Defendant:
American Petroleum Tankers X LLC, Crowley Marine Services, Inc., Kinder Morgan, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. v. Julia Oldendorff M/V
as 2:2018cv01659
Plaintiff:
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
Defendant:
Julia Oldendorff M/V and Oldendorff Carriers GMBH & Co. KG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Occidental Chemical Corporation v. American River Transportation Company, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv12012
Plaintiff:
Occidental Chemical Corporation
Defendant:
American River Transportation Company, LLC, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Kenneth Welch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Dreibodt, et al v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc., et al
as 5:2016cv00011
Defendant:
Archer Daniels Midland Company, Bunge North America, Inc., Cargill Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
David Dreibodt and Ron Wetz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Property Damage (P.I
Archer Daniels Midland Company v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv02891
Plaintiff:
Archer Daniels Midland Company
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. and Syngenta Crop Protection LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ADM Grain River System Inc. et al v. Fortune Wing M/V
as 2:2013cv04685
Plaintiff:
ADM Grain River System, Inc. , American River Transportation Co. and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
Defendant:
Fortune Wing M/V and Mitsui OSK Lines, Tokyo Japan
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
