Cases 151 - 160 of 177
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
DeJesus v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
as 4:2009cv03484
Plaintiff:
Epifano DeJesus
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Taylor v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2009cv00180
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Taylor
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice and The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv02928
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Warner v. Wright et al
as 1:2009cv00124
Plaintiff:
Charles Clay Warner, Jr.
Defendant:
Curtis James Wright, Richard G. Leal, Bonnie Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Wilkerson v. Bell
as 6:2009cv00191
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dwayne Wilkerson
Defendant:
Jerry W. Bell, Leigh Harding, John Riggle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Richardson v. Texas Department of Crimnal Justice et al
as 1:2008cv00895
Plaintiff:
Putnam Richardson
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Melissa Underhill and Garrett Gilliam
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv00418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
