Cases 161 - 170 of 177
Taylor v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2008cv00127
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Taylor
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice and The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv00369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cox et al v. State Of Texas et al
as 4:2008cv02758
Plaintiff:
Cecil C. Cox and Robert Earl Cox
Defendant:
State Of Texas, Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, University of Texas Medical Branch-Texas Department of Criminal Justice Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lee v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice I.D.
as 1:2008cv00110
Plaintiff:
Seneca Lambrone Lee
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice I.D.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Isibor v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2008cv00104
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Isibor
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice and State of Texas
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv02365
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lee v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice I.D.
as 1:2008cv00072
Plaintiff:
Seneca L Lee
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice I.D.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McPherson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 3:2008cv00151
Plaintiff:
Gregory McPherson
Defendant:
Ives, Boone and Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv01282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
