Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Harper v. City of Missouri City, Texas et al
as 4:2018cv01562
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Harper
Defendant:
City of Missouri City, Texas, Gregory Nelson, John Doe I and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Brandi's Hope Community Services, LLC et al v. Graf et al
as 1:2018cv00022
Plaintiff:
Brandi's Hope Community Services, LLC and Danny O. Cowart
Defendant:
Andy Graf , Sheryl Graf , The Grove Subdivision Homeowners Association, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Scott v. Dillards, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00024
Plaintiff:
Kendarious Scott
Defendant:
Dillards, Inc. and John Does I-V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Worley v. Lawrence et al
as 4:2017cv00193
Plaintiff:
Richard Worley
Defendant:
Danny Lawrence, Bryan Griffith, Randy Sweat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singh, Ph.D. v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01120
Defendant:
Ex-Police Chief Art Acevedo, Austin Police Department, City of Austin and others
Plaintiff:
Ravindra Singh, Ph.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jenkins v. Brennan et al
as 3:2017cv00194
Plaintiff:
Brandy C Jenkins
Defendant:
Megan J. Brennan, Kirby Ragsdale and John Does I-V
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivy et al v. City of Magee, Mississippi et al
as 3:2017cv00164
Plaintiff:
Michael Ivy and Michele Ivy
Defendant:
City of Magee, Mississippi , Joey Womack , William Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. McKenzie et al
as 1:2017cv00021
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lynn Hill
Defendant:
Jim McKenzie, David A Vela, Sam Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Boykin et al
as 1:2016cv00187
Plaintiff:
Ricky Martin
Defendant:
Canyon Boykin, Johnny Branch, Yolanda Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bartee, Jr. v. Harris County et al
as 4:2016cv02944
Defendant:
Harris County , Andrew Rowell, John Doe I and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Bartee, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
