Cases 11 - 20 of 200
Morrison v. Rosen et al
as 4:2023cv03249
Plaintiff:
Ms Mary Nicole Morrison and Mary Nicole Morrison
Defendant:
Mr. Alan Rosen, Sgt Brodie Riner, Vicki King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Berry v. McLennan County, Texas et al
as 6:2023cv00636
Plaintiff:
Marvin Lovell Berry
Defendant:
McLennan County, Texas, Parnell McNamara, Ricky Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
King v. Collier
as 6:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
Brenda Elaine King
Defendant:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VANDERPOOL MANAGEMENT, LP v. SLOAN et al
as 5:2023cv00461
Plaintiff:
VANDERPOOL MANAGEMENT, LP
Defendant:
DON SLOAN, BOB WILLIAMS, NEIL BOULTINGHOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Yoon v. Garg et al
as 4:2022cv04089
Plaintiff:
Jung-Hoon Yoon
Defendant:
Nisha J. Garg, Carolee King, Daniel Sharphorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Contreras v. Wilson et al
as 4:2022cv04015
Plaintiff:
Adam Contreras
Defendant:
David Wilson, Melissa Wilson, Fox News 26 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
