Cases 21 - 30 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv01201
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00177
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Garcia et al v. Silva et al
as 2:2017cv00058
Plaintiff:
Jean Garcia and Ricardo Garcia
Defendant:
D Sifuentes and Agent Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frances Rios v. City of Corpus Christi, Texas, et al
as 17-40854
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCES RIOS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, MARGIE SILVA, also known as Margie Flores, YVETTE AGUILAR and others
Sagrario Silva v. Spring Branch Indep Sch Dist, et al
as 17-20210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAGRARIO E. SILVA
Defendant - Appellee:
SPRING BRANCH INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, ELLEN SPALDING, In their individual capacities, KAREN HEETH, In their individual capacities and others
Blakely et al v. Kelly et al
as 3:2016cv02801
Plaintiff:
Quincy Demond Blakely and Kimberly Blakely
Defendant:
Jeanette L Kelly, Fernando Silva, Warren H Aeria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00977
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
De Los Rios v. City of Donna et al
as 7:2016cv00512
Defendant:
City of Donna, Simon Sauceda, Sonia Gallegos and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Francisco De Los Rios
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
