Cases 31 - 40 of 165
Miller et al v. Stroman et al
as 1:2019cv00475
Plaintiff:
Robert Nichols, Nathan Farish, George Rogers and others
Defendant:
Manuel Chavez, Det. Jeffrey Rogers, City of Waco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson et al. v. White et al.
as 4:2019cv00110
Plaintiff:
I A and Victoria Anderson
Defendant:
Brent Hill, Frank Erler, Aaryn Lamb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anderson v. White et al
as 3:2019cv00270
Plaintiff:
I A and Victoria Anderson
Defendant:
Brent Hill, Aaryn Lamb, Crystal Stokes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lockhart v. Stroman et al
as 1:2018cv01038
Plaintiff:
Richard Lockhart
Defendant:
Det. Jeffrey Rogers, Abelino "Abel" Reyna, Chief Brent Stroman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pilkington v. Stroman et al
as 1:2018cv01039
Defendant:
Det. Jeffrey Rogers, Abelino "Abel" Reyna, Chief Brent Stroman and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Pilkington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Stroman et al
as 1:2018cv01040
Defendant:
Det. Jeffrey Rogers, Abelino "Abel" Reyna, Steven Schwartz and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Stroman et al
as 1:2018cv01041
Defendant:
Manuel Chavez, Abelino "Abel" Reyna, McLennan County, Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Marshall Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guerrero v. Stroman et al
as 1:2018cv01042
Defendant:
Manuel Chavez, Abelino "Abel" Reyna, McLennan County, Texas and others
Plaintiff:
John Guerrero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cantu, Jr. v. Stroman et al
as 1:2018cv01043
Plaintiff:
Richard Cantu, Jr.
Defendant:
Det. Jeffrey Rogers, Abelino "Abel" Reyna, Detective Manuel Chaves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McAlister v. Stroman et al
as 1:2018cv01044
Defendant:
Manuel Chavez, Abelino "Abel" Reyna, McLennan County, Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Wes McAlister
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
