Cases 51 - 60 of 259
Sharpless et al v. Thump
as 3:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
Dennis Clay Sharpless
Defendant:
Donlnor Thump and Dr Grissel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dutschmann et al v. City of Waco et al
as 6:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Wanda Dutschmann and Marcie Schreck
Defendant:
City of Waco, Mayor Dillon Meek, Waco Police Department and others
Amicus Curiae:
David W Dumas and Colin H O'Neill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Dr Mays et al
as 4:2022cv00009
Petitioner:
Franklin C Smith
Defendant:
Dr. Mays, Dr. Chad Hara and Antonie & Ernest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00075
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Skurich et al v. Biden et al
as 3:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Daron Skurich, Hernan Orellana, Brady Gruhn and others
Defendant:
President Joseph Biden, SAFER FEDERAL WORKFORCE TASK FORCE, OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Marroquin v. Northside Independent School District et al
as 5:2021cv01041
Plaintiff:
Jamie Marroquin
Defendant:
Northside Independent School District and Dr. Brian Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01234
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
