Cases 61 - 70 of 83
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-20493
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Willrich v. The United States et al
as 3:2013cv02670
Plaintiff:
Candace Willrich
Defendant:
The United States of America, U.S. Department of Justice, Susan Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beck v. Parker et al
as 1:2013cv00556
Defendant:
Board Member Steven J. Austin, Board Member Mary Baty, RDH, Board Member Dr. William Birdwell and others
Plaintiff:
M.D., D.M.D. Robert Lee Beck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-30595
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv03350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chryar-Byrd v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division et al
as 6:2011cv00157
Defendant:
Kimberly Briggs, Ruth Cumberland, FNU Ellisor and others
Plaintiff:
Tanya Chryar-Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-50498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kristofer Kastner v. Texas Board of Law Examiners, et al
as 10-50201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KRISTOFER THOMAS KASTNER
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS, STATE OF TEXAS, JULIA E VAUGHAN, Individually, and as Board Member and Executive Director of the Texas Board of Law Examiners and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
