Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Drake v. FedEx Ground Package System Inc
as 3:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System Inc, Molly Smith, Arthur William Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Avdeef v. US Department of Justice et al
as 4:2021cv00451
Defendant:
Texas Governor Greg Abbott, Patrick W. Powers, Judge Don Cosby and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen M Avdeef
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drake v. Hecht et al
as 7:2015cv00141
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
Nathan L Hecht , William Ken Tapscott, Jr, Blake Hawthorne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-11113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-11089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Peyton v. United States District Court Northern District of Texas, et al
as 4:2011cv00569
Plaintiff:
Melvin Peyton
Defendant:
United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Terry R Means, Jorge A Solis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bello, et al v. Means, et al
as 08-11027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONIE WILLIAMS and MIKE BELLO
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY R. MEANS, U. S. District Judge, EUGENE DUBOSE, Attorney and UNKNOWN OTHERS
Odeh v. Mitchell, et al
as 08-11019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSAMA ODEH
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN MITCHELL, A. JOE FISH, U. S. District Judge, TERRY R. MEANS, U. S. District Judge and others
Bello, et al v. Means, et al
as 08-10979
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKE BELLO and TONIE WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY R. MEANS, U. S. District Judge, EUGENE DUBOSE, Attorney and UNKNOWN OTHERS
Bello v. Means et al
as 4:2008cv00523
Plaintiff:
Mike Bello and Tonie Williams
Defendant:
Terry R Means, Eugene DuBose and Unknown others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
