Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Dowling v. Uber Technologies Inc.
as 1:2023cv01257
Plaintiff:
Angela D Dowling and Angela D. Perez Dowling
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ebrahimi v. Fields et al
as 3:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Shamim Ebrahimi
Defendant:
Michael R. Fields, Netflix, Inc., Electronic Arts, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Said v. Wray et al
as 1:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Mody Said
Defendant:
Christopher Wray, Dara Khosrowshahi, Logan Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. Hernandez et al
as 1:2020cv01173
Defendant:
Vivint Inc., Dr. M. Burrows, Wal-Mart Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Wynston Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manogna v. CPS et al
as 3:2019cv01743
Defendant:
Labanon Ridge Apartments, Hospitals, Kris Kat Seanes and others
Plaintiff:
Devabhaktuni Manogna and Manogna Devabhaktuni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Phillips-Berry v. Trump et al
as 2:2018cv07890
Defendant:
U.S. States Military, Department of Justice of the State of Louisiana, Louisiana Department of Family Services and others
Plaintiff:
Shanta G. Phillips-Berry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips-Berry v. Scurlock et al
as 2:2018cv07738
Defendant:
U.S. States Military, Louisiana Office of Motor Vehicle, Ochsner Healthcare System and others
Plaintiff:
Shanta G. Phillips-Berry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Small v. Federal Government et al
as 2:2018cv04659
Plaintiff:
Clarence Adolph Small
Defendant:
Federal Government, Government of Louisiana, U.S. Postal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
