Cases 11 - 20 of 336
Kennard v. Trevino et al
as 4:2023cv02383
Plaintiff:
Jason Jerome Kennard
Defendant:
Brandon Trevino, Ramon Serrano, Shara Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trevino v. Cook
as 23-50382
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Vallejo Trevino
Defendant / Appellee:
Sheriff Maurice Cook, Ms. P. O'Grady, Lieutenant FNU Hanna and others
Johnson v. Nunez et al
as 2:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Alex Bernard Johnson
Defendant:
Juan J. Nunez, Jerry J. Sanchez, Placido Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Nunez et al
as 1:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Alex Bernard Johnson
Defendant:
Juan J. Nunez, Jerry J. Sanchez, Placido Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welsh v. McLane, et al
as 5:2023cv00053
Petitioner:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Respondent:
Marsha McLane, Chris Greenwalt, Michael Searchy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trevino-Alvarez v. Hawkins
as 4:2023cv00910
Petitioner:
Rosalinda Trevino-Alvarez
Respondent:
Warden T. Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gomez v. Nunez
as 2:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Santiago Mason Gomez
Defendant:
Juan J Nunez, J.D. Mireles and Rosalinda Trevino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trevino-Mendoza v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00009
Petitioner:
Roberto Trevino-Mendoza
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Welsh v. McLane et al
as 1:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Marsha McLane, Chris Greenwalt, Michael Searchy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trevino v. Price
as 22-51032
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Andrew Trevino
Defendant / Appellee:
Timothy Price, Homicide Detective, Austin Police Department
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
