Cases 11 - 20 of 1,466
Muniz v. Montgomery County Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2024cv01139
Plaintiff:
Juan Muniz, Jr.
Defendant:
Montgomery County Sheriff Department, Deputy Adam Johnson and Deputy Zachary Kraft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wedgeworth v. Collier et al
as 4:2024cv01071
Plaintiff:
James Scott Wedgeworth
Defendant:
Director of TDCJ Bryan Collier, Officer Henry Adams, Doctor Farly Lamb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Lumpkin
as 24-20106
Petitioner:
Alex Adams
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Adams v. Lumpkin
as 24-20110
Petitioner:
Alex Adams
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, re
Hickson v. Haulcy
as 24-30165
Plaintiff:
Henry Hickson
Defendant:
Terrance Haulcy, Danny Henshaw, Captain Jones and others
Verlander v. Aransas County Sheriffs Dept et al
as 2:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Adam Wayne Verlander
Defendant:
Aransas County Sheriffs Dept, Sheriff William Mills, Armando Chapa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Robert Edwin Hawkins
Defendant:
Jayce Jones and Xavier Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welsh v. Management and Training Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Management and Training Corporation, Sergio Molina, Wayne Schmoker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00688
Petitioner:
Alex Adams
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malone v. Unknown Bulverde Police Dept.
as 5:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Ryan Jamal Malone
Defendant:
Unknown Bulverde Police Dept. and Adam James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
