Cases 11 - 20 of 90
Finch v. State Bar of Texas et al
as 2:2019cv00053
Plaintiff:
Drake Finch and Drake Jordan Finch
Defendant:
Christine McKeeman, James English, I Ibarra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finch v. The State of Texas et al
as 2:2018cv00220
Defendant:
Northwest Texas Hospital, Attorney General of Texas (Office), Micheal Peterson and others
Plaintiff:
Drake Finch and Drake Jordan Finch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Anderson et al
as 9:2018cv00157
Defendant:
Corr English and Terera A Anderson
Plaintiff:
Mason James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason James v. Teresa Anderson, et al
as 18-40815
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MASON JAMES
Defendant - Appellee:
TERESA A. ANDERSON, HAZEL J. ENGLISH, A. WALKER and others
Finch v. Governor of the State of Texas et al
as 2:2018cv00108
Plaintiff:
Drake Finch
Defendant:
Governor of the State of Texas, Lt. Governor State of Texas, Deputy Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
English v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 4:2018cv01585
Plaintiff:
Jake Anthony English
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation and Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Weller et al
as 4:2017cv03905
Plaintiff:
Lawrence C. Williams
Defendant:
Calvin Weller, Curtis D. Bridges, Jr., Charles H. Landis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John English v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-11182
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN ALLEN ENGLISH
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
James v. Anderson et al
as 9:2017cv00160
Plaintiff:
Mason James
Defendant:
Teresa A Anderson, Hazel J English, A. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
English v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2017cv01134
Petitioner:
John Allen English
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
