Cases 11 - 20 of 88
Hamilton v. Foti, et al
as 08-30508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODNEY HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES C FOTI, JR., Attorney General, State of Louisiana and JON A GEGENHEIMER, Clerk of Court 24th Judicial District Court
Taylor v. Travis et al
as 2:2008cv01745
Plaintiff:
Gardner Taylor
Defendant:
Jeffery Travis
Respondent:
Charles C. Foti, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gillespie v. Wilkinson et al
as 2:2008cv01675
Plaintiff:
Tobie Gillespie
Defendant:
Tim Wilkinson
Respondent:
Charles C. Foti, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Young v. Jones et al
as 2:2008cv00888
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Young
Defendant:
Alvin Jones
Respondent:
Charles C. Foti, Jr. and Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crum v. Foti et al
as 3:2008cv00057
Plaintiff:
Earl Crum
Defendant:
Charles Foti and Doug Moreau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Hubert et al
as 3:2008cv00011
Petitioner:
Warren Scott, III
Respondent:
Cornel H. Hubert and Charles C. Foti, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clifford v. State of Louisiana et al
as 3:2007cv00955
Plaintiff:
David D. Clifford
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, Kathleen Blanco, Louisiana Legislature and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guidry v. Jones et al
as 3:2007cv00950
Petitioner:
Robert Guidry
Respondent:
Alvin Jones and Charles C. Foti, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. Hubert et al
as 2:2007cv09527
Plaintiff:
Irvin Brooks
Respondent:
Cornel Hubert and Charles Foti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burges v. Travis et al
as 2:2007cv09368
Plaintiff:
Broderick Burges
Defendant:
Jeffery Travis
Respondent:
Charles Foti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
