Cases 11 - 20 of 60
Simmons v. Salazar et al
as 5:2022cv00579
Plaintiff:
Ryan David Simmons
Defendant:
Bexar County Sheriff Javier Salazar, Capt. FNU Reyes, Capt. FNU Pena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lemoine v. Lo
as 2:2022cv01027
Plaintiff:
Derrion Joseph Lemoine
Defendant:
William Lo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews et al v. Lo et al
as 2:2021cv01862
Plaintiff:
Cody M. Matthews, Frank William Beckendorf, III and Frank W. Beckendorf, III
Defendant:
William Lo, J. Ham, Aaron Mendow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De Los Santos v. Lumpkin
as 5:2021cv00416
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Maria De Los Santos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Aloba v. Client Dragoo et al
as 4:2020cv03100
Defendant:
Los Angeles Superior Court, Los Angeles County Jail, Client Dragoo and others
Plaintiff:
Oriyomi Sadiq Aloba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mor v. Gordy et al
as 3:2020cv01215
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security, Warden Johnson County Jail, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner:
Lo Mor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01100
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jones v. Warden Bergami et al
as 3:2019cv00254
Petitioner:
Henry Jones
Respondent:
ICE Los Angeles (Deportation Proceedings), Warden Bergami, ICE, El Paso & West Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Muhammad et al v. Salazar et al
as 5:2019cv00985
Plaintiff:
Azizallah Sheriff Muhammad, Sidney Wilson, Boutire and others
Defendant:
City Police Chief John Doe, Corp. E. Basaldua, Sgt. R. De Los Santos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williamson v. Larpenter et al
as 2:2019cv00254
Defendant:
Gordan Dove, Warden Bergeron, Jerry Larpenter and others
Plaintiff:
Garland W Williamson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
