Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Parker v. Temple Police Department et al
as 6:2017cv00043
Defendant:
McNeill Fairey and Temple Police Department
Plaintiff:
Larry Wayne Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeill v. Stephens
as 6:2015cv00213
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Lawrence Keith McNeill
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McNeill v. Stephens
as 1:2014cv00178
Petitioner:
Lawrence Keith McNeill
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Acosta v. McNeill et al
as 3:2013cv00113
Plaintiff:
Arnulfo Acosta
Defendant:
Elmore County, Alabama and J. Randall McNeill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00495
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Stewart v. Wiley et al
as 3:2009cv00785
Plaintiff:
Clarence Tyrone Stewart, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeffrey F. Wiley, Unknown McNeill, Unknown Maxell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeill v. Quarterman
as 6:2009cv00037
Petitioner:
Rex Cody McNeill
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McNeill v. Goff
as 08-60337
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM ROGER MCNEILL
Respondent - Appellee:
PRESTON GOFF, Warden
McNeill v. Mendoza
as 6:2007cv00344
Petitioner:
Lawrence Keith McNeill
Respondent:
Oscar Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DO NOT DOCKET - CASE TRANSFERRED OUT. McNeill v. Mendoza
as 2:2007cv00402
Petitioner:
Lawrence Keith McNeill
Respondent:
Oscar Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
