Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Davis v. Webster et al
as 4:2017cv03128
Plaintiff:
John D Davis
Defendant:
Angela R Webster, Parsons, McEntire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parsons v. Willingham et al
as 3:2017cv02056
Plaintiff:
John Parsons
Defendant:
Charles Willingham and Kristin Trimble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parsons v. Thompson
as 3:2017cv01796
Plaintiff:
John Parsons
Defendant:
Lowell Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00399
Plaintiff:
Walter Gene Parson
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammond v. Kirk et al
as 4:2015cv02476
Plaintiff:
William McKinley Hammond
Defendant:
Chris Kirk, Jarvis Parsons, Travis Bryan, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boothe v. Parsons et al
as 6:2013cv00925
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Boothe
Defendant:
Robin Parsons, Michael Lindsey, James Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parson v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 5:2013cv00136
Petitioner:
Anthony Carl Parson
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parsons v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2013cv00383
Petitioner:
John Parsons
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pigg v. Gamble et al
as 5:2013cv00564
Plaintiff:
Randy Pigg
Defendant:
Gertrude Gamble, John M Parsons, Johnston H Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boothe v. Campbell et al
as 6:2013cv00190
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Boothe
Defendant:
James Campbell, Michael Lindsey, Robin Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
