Cases 11 - 20 of 364
Powell v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Phillip Ray Powell
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maida v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Maida
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bell v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Joel Bell
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-50156
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Ramos
as 23-50122
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Raul Ramos, also known as Alto, also known as Naranjo, also known as GQ, also known as Raulito, also known as Cochise
Ramos v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00045
Petitioner:
Fabian Garcia Ramos
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Smith v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv00352
Plaintiff:
Carlos Lamar Smith
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Ramos Vela, Casey Celum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv00357
Plaintiff:
Carlos Lamar Smith
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Felipe Gonzalez, Jr., Ramos Vela and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Lumpkin
as 23-50060
Petitioner / Appellant:
Daniel Ramos
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Odom v. Gregg County Sheriff's Department et al
as 6:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
James Ralph Odom
Defendant:
Gregg County Sheriff's Department, Unknown Grizzle, Unknown Ramo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
