Cases 11 - 20 of 281
Willis v. McClure
as 3:2023cv00573
Plaintiff:
Rayfield LeRoy Willis
Defendant:
Superintendent M. McClure
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hollins v. Sistrunk et al
as 3:2023cv00558
Plaintiff:
Gregory A. Hollins
Defendant:
Superintendent Brady Sistrunk and D. Ellis
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Cain
as 23-60384
Petitioner / Appellant:
Billy Carol Anderson, Sr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Brand Huffman, Superintendent, Brand Huffman and Burl Cain, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections
Amerson v. McClure et al
as 4:2023cv00119
Petitioner:
Lee Tommie Amerson
Defendant:
Superintendent Marc McClure and Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Anderson v. Anastasio et al
as 3:2023cv00403
Plaintiff:
Levonzel Anderson
Defendant:
Psych Doctor Roger Anastasio, Unknown Martin, Superintendent Brad Huffman and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Huffman
as 23-60331
Petitioner / Appellant:
Chad R. Sanders
Respondent / Appellee:
Brand Huffman, Superintendent
Winding v. McClure
as 23-60252
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James C. Winding
Defendant / Appellee:
Marc McClure, Superintendent and Raymond Roberts, Warden, Mississippi State Penitentiary
Johnson v. Huffman
as 5:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Alvin Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Superintendent Brand Huffman
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bevalaque v. McClure et al
as 3:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
John M. Bevalaque
Defendant:
Superintendent Marc McClure and Attorney General Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gray v. Huffman
as 23-60212
Petitioner / Appellant:
Natyyo Gray
Respondent / Appellee:
Superintendent Brand Huffman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
