Cases 11 - 20 of 102,692
Hughes v. Captain Gipson et al
as 9:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Charles Harold Hughes
Defendant:
Captain Gibson, Sgt Sykes and Office of the Attorney General - Amicus Curiae
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deases v. Mr. B. Cain et al Case transferred to the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division.
as 6:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Estevan Deases
Respondent:
Mr. B. Cain and M.T.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weber v. Daniels et al
as 1:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
David A. Weber
Defendant:
Duane Daniels, District Attorney and Judge FNU Tibby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Lange
as 6:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Quinten Lovell Brown
Defendant:
Eddy Lange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patton v. USA
as 5:2024cv00078
Petitioner:
Heather Rochelle Patton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Sutherland v. USA
as 3:2024cv01219
Petitioner:
Joshua Sutherland
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01226
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Byrd v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Norman Byrd
Defendant:
NFN Gonzales, NFN Cummings and NFN Suffield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olvera-Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Jose Francisco Olvera-Rodriguez
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Thompson v. The United States Of America Do not docket in this case. File only in 4:17-cr-566-3 & 4:17-cr-414-3
as 4:2024cv01892
Petitioner:
Charles Wendell Thompson
Respondent:
The United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
