Cases 21 - 30 of 423
Curry v. Lumpkin
as 22-40761
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Chico Nakia Curry
Defendant / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Hanna W. Nicholas, T. Burson, Assistant Warden, Beto 1 Unit and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Lorie Davis
Gray v. Batastini et al
as 6:2022cv01211
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gray
Defendant:
Ashley B Batastini, FNU Madrano, FNU Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Davis et al
as 1:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Willie Earl Curry
Defendant:
Warden Josh Davis, Chris Epps and Commissioner Burl Cain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Lighten et al
as 6:2022cv00835
Plaintiff:
Andrie Smith
Defendant:
Major Lawrence Lighten, Michelle Washburn, Ashley Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry, Jr. v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
James Curry, Jr.
Defendant:
Shannon Asst Police Chief Steven Johnson, Other Officer John Doe, Steven Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Nash
as 22-60360
Petitioner / Appellant:
Hakeem Curry
Respondent / Appellee:
Cheron Nash, Warden, Federal Correctional Institute Yazoo City Medium
Curry v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2022cv00097
Petitioner:
Donny Joe Curry
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gregory v. Waybourn et al
as 4:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Gregory
Defendant:
Billy Waybourn, Tarrant County Sheriff's Dept, Tim Curry Criminal Justice Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00254
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00529
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
