Cases 21 - 30 of 117
Edwards v. Gregory et al
as 1:2015cv00229
Plaintiff:
Johnny Edwards
Defendant:
Jackie Gregory, Jerilyn Davis and Dennis Melton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gipson v. Martin et al
as 1:2015cv00178
Plaintiff:
Earnie Gipson
Defendant:
Robert Martin, Dennis Melton and Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torre v. Clay et al
as 3:2015cv00280
Respondent:
Warden Becky Clay and DHO M Melton
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Petitioner:
John Torre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moreno v. Kirsta et al
as 5:2015cv00170
Defendant:
Mary Teresa Green, Dr. Nancy Kellogg and Melton L. Kirsta
Plaintiff:
Juan A. Moreno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moreno v. Kirsta et al Do Not Docket. Case electronically transferred to the San Antonio Division of the Western District of Texas.
as 2:2015cv00108
Plaintiff:
Juan A Moreno
Defendant:
Melton L Kirsta, Mary Teresa Green and Nancy Kellogg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. Melton
as 1:2015cv00035
Plaintiff:
Troy Chambers
Defendant:
Dennis Melton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moreno v. Kirsta et al
as 5:2015cv00098
Respondent:
Jessica Cantu, Mary Teresa Green, Dr. FNU Kellogg and others
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Juan A. Moreno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casher v. Melton et al
as 1:2014cv00120
Plaintiff:
DShawn Casher
Defendant:
Dennis Melton, Jessie Bhata Singh and Victoria Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdallah v. Samuals, et al
as 5:2014cv00059
Petitioner:
Kamal Abdallah
Respondent:
Charles E. Samuals, M Melton, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Melton v. McClelland et al
as 4:2014cv01022
Plaintiff:
Adrian Melton
Defendant:
Charles McClelland, J.R. Sneed, D.A. Morrelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
