Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Rios v. Collier et al
as 9:2020cv00253
Defendant:
Conrado Palacios, Jr., Pierre Montero, Edgar G. Acuna and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen P. Rios
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mares v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2019cv00067
Plaintiff:
Marcos Mares
Defendant:
Alonso Ammsord and Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mott v. Edwars et al
as 6:2019cv00027
Plaintiff:
Austin Mott, Jr.
Defendant:
Jose G Mares, Duke G Mageto, Frederic M. Edwars and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Moore v. Norris Jackson, et al
as 18-40756
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
NORRIS D. JACKSON, Senior Warden of the Beto I Unit, BRYAN COLLIER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, JENNIFER COSTLOW, Registered Nurse - University of Texas Medical Branch and others
Lara-Mares v. United States of America
as 7:2018cv00205
Plaintiff:
Fidencio Lara-Mares
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Moore v. Jackson et al
as 6:2018cv00313
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Moore
Defendant:
Norris D Jackson, Bryan Collier, Traci A Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guillermo Lerma v. Robert Stevens, et al
as 17-10185
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GUILLERMO MORENO LERMA
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT K. STEVENS, Warden I, TYRONE JONES, Sergeant of Corrections Officer, JENIFER A. MARES, Corrections Officer and others
Reyna Mares, Jr. v. Lacy
as 4:2017cv00176
Petitioner:
Andres Reyna Mares, Jr.
Respondent:
Robert Lacy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mares v. Lacy et al
as 4:2016cv03469
Plaintiff:
Andres Reyna Mares, Jr
Defendant:
Robert Lacy and Medical Department CCA/HPC Houston Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia De Mares v. USA
as 5:2016cv00248
Petitioner:
Eva Garcia De Mares
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
