Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Smith v. Jones et al
as 3:2010cv00084
Plaintiff:
Daniel Aaron Smith
Defendant:
James Jones, Syed Kazmi and Alvarado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson et al v. Lacy et al
as 4:2010cv00743
Plaintiff:
Waqas Wilson, Adil Mohammad, Biniam Tekle Abraha and others
Defendant:
Robert Lacy, Kenneth Landgrebe, John Doe 1 to 50 and others
Movant:
Fazal Karim, Francisco J Espinosa, Rufino Revercio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zhao et al v. Adams et al
as 2:2010cv00034
Plaintiff:
Qian Ibrahim Zhao, Shiraz Syed Qazi, Saleemullah Sheriss and others
Defendant:
Robert Adams and Kenneth Landgrebe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-60149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jerry Dorsey v. Tracey Rubiola, et al
as 10-60037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY SY DORSEY
Defendant - Appellee:
TRACEY RUBIOLA, DIXON WISE, Dentist and UNKNOWN OFFICIALS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-60023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Zhao et al v. Adams et al
as 4:2009cv04133
Plaintiff:
Qian Ibrahim Zhao, Shiraz Syed Qazi, Saleemullah Sheriss and others
Defendant:
Robert Adams and Kenneth Landgrebe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorsey v. Rubiola et al
as 5:2009cv00012
Plaintiff:
Jerry Sy Dorsey
Defendant:
Unknown Rubiola, Unknown Wise and Unknown Officials
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mehboob v. Mukasey et al
as 4:2008cv01829
Petitioner:
Syed Mohammed Mehboob
Respondent:
Michael B Mukasey, Michael Chertoff and Kenneth Landgrebe
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Qazi v. Mukasey et al
as 4:2008cv00913
Petitioner:
Shiraz Syed Qazi
Respondent:
Michael B Mukasey, Michael Chertoff and Kenneth Landgrebe
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
