Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Lugo v. Thaler
as 1:2012cv00760
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Charles Randall Lugo
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lugo-Orosco v. USA
as 4:2012cv00156
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Francisco Lugo-Orosco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Reynolds v. Nguyen et al
as 3:2012cv00012
Defendant:
Linda Carranza-Gonzales, David O. Chavez, Joehassin Cordero, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas K. Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lugo v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2011cv01146
Petitioner:
Luis Ramiro Lugo
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilborn Brumit, Jr. v. Janay Williams, et al
as 10-10494
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILBORN BRUMIT, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JANAY B WILLIAMS, Property Officer, CHRISTINA MELTON CRAIN, Chairman, Texas Criminal Justice Board, BRAD LIVINGSTON, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and others
Wilson et al v. Lacy et al
as 4:2010cv00743
Plaintiff:
Waqas Wilson, Adil Mohammad, Biniam Tekle Abraha and others
Defendant:
Robert Lacy, Kenneth Landgrebe, John Doe 1 to 50 and others
Movant:
Fazal Karim, Francisco J Espinosa, Rufino Revercio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lugo v. USA
as 4:2010cv00020
Petitioner:
Sixto Sanchez Lugo
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Lugo v. Livingston et al
as 1:2009cv00515
Plaintiff:
Joe Manuel Lugo
Defendant:
Brad Livingston and Reginald Goings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lugo Chavez v. Quarterman
as 7:2009cv00156
Petitioner:
Gilberto Lugo Chavez
Respondent:
Nathanial Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chavez v. Quarterman
as 4:2008cv03726
Petitioner:
Gilberto Lugo Chavez
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
