Cases 31 - 40 of 336
Bell v. Trevino et al
as 7:2022cv00204
Plaintiff:
Marcus Bell
Defendant:
Sgt Trevino, L. Webb and J. Gauna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trevino v. Price
as 1:2022cv00568
Plaintiff:
Andrew Trevino
Defendant:
Timothy Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stoneham v. DeLeon et al
as 5:2022cv00549
Plaintiff:
Frank Stoneham
Defendant:
Michael DeLeon, Velia Meza, District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trevino v. Gutierrez
as 22-40229
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jose Reyes Lujan Trevino
Defendant / Appellee:
Armando Gutierrez, Individually and in his official capacity, Victor Lujan, Individually and in his official capacity, Jane Doe, Individually and in her official capacity and others
Arnoldo v. Chapa
as 5:2022cv00054
Petitioner:
Curiel Trevino Luis Arnoldo and Luis Arnoldo Curiel Trevino
Respondent:
Rachel Chapa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
McGee v. Sanchez et al
as 2:2022cv00034
Plaintiff:
KeAnthony McGee
Defendant:
Jerry J. Sanchez, Rosalinda Trevino and Richard V. Cathcart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trevino v. Lumpkin
as 22-40091
Petitioner / Appellant:
Paulo Trevino, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Trevino v. Price
as 1:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
Andrew Trevino
Defendant:
Timothy Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trevino v. Salazar et al
as 5:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jaime Trevino
Defendant:
Javier Salazar, C.O. FNU Padilla, Officer FNU Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trevino v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2022cv00019
Petitioner:
Ramiro Trevino
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
