Cases 31 - 40 of 293
Garrison v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
William Garrison
Defendant:
Bruce Armstrong, Spencer Lucas, Daniel Parler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brantner v. Collier et al
as 6:2022cv01251
Plaintiff:
Carlton E. Brantner
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Bruce L. Armstrong, Justin S. Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cornelison v. Armstrong
as 3:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Tyson Cornelison
Defendant:
Jason Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Elayn Hunt et al
as 3:2022cv00923
Plaintiff:
Caleb Armstrong
Defendant:
Elayn Hunt and Public Safety and Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Batastini et al
as 6:2022cv01211
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gray
Defendant:
Ashley B Batastini, FNU Madrano, FNU Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. TDCJ Executive Director et al
as 4:2022cv04244
Plaintiff:
Darryl Bell
Defendant:
TDCJ Executive Director, University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) Director, Warden B. Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welsh v. Diaz et al
as 5:2022cv00237
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Misty Diaz, Chris Weston, Craig Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2022cv03308
Petitioner:
Jimmy Jackson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin and FNU Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fletcher v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2022cv00894
Plaintiff:
Jarene Fletcher
Defendant:
Bruce Armstrong, Ashley Barnes, Julieann Glover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Archer v. Sweet et al
as 4:2022cv03238
Plaintiff:
Jason Paul Archer
Defendant:
Christopher Sweet, I. Santillanes, Charles H. Bonsal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
