Cases 31 - 40 of 68
Fernando Sanchez Cortez v. Beeville County Jail, et al
as 14-40356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FERNANDO JAVIER SANCHEZ CORTEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
BEEVILLE COUNTY JAIL, INSTITUTIONAL HEALTH SERVICE and DOES 1-100
Montes v. United States of America, et al
as 4:2014cv00107
Plaintiff:
Luigi Montes
Defendant:
United States of America, Fannin County Jail and Johan Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. McAdams et al
as 5:2014cv00011
Plaintiff:
Jose Artega Rodriguez
Defendant:
S McAdams, H Bryan and Dalby Health Service Johan Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Solano v. Dixon et al
as 5:2014cv00010
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Acosta Solano
Defendant:
K Dixon, H Bryan and Dalby Facility Officers Johan Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palacios v. Bryan et al
as 5:2014cv00009
Plaintiff:
Jose Aguirre Palacios
Defendant:
H Bryan and Dalby Health Service Johan Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bautista v. Luera et al
as 5:2014cv00006
Plaintiff:
Roberto Bautista
Defendant:
C Luera, S McAdams and Dalby Health Service Johan Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montes v. McAdam et al
as 5:2014cv00005
Plaintiff:
Luigi Montes
Defendant:
S McAdam, H Bryan and Dalby Health Service Johan Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Munoz v. Bryan et al
as 5:2014cv00004
Plaintiff:
Feliciano Munoz
Defendant:
H Bryan, L Bond and Dalby Facility Health Service Johan Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ibarra v. Dixon et al
as 5:2013cv00285
Plaintiff:
Juan Cardona Ibarra
Defendant:
K Dixon, H Bryan and Dalby Correctional Officers Doe 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silva-Isaias v. Mills et al
as 6:2013cv00384
Defendant:
Captain FNU Hullum, Limestone Detention Center Doe 1 - 100 and K. Mills
Plaintiff:
Samuel Alfredo Silva-Isaias
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
