Cases 31 - 40 of 367
Trevino v. Bastrop County, et al.
as 1:2022cv01204
Plaintiff:
Michael Vallejo Trevino
Defendant:
Bastrop County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff Maurice Cook, Ms. P O'Grady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00116
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1131 ca Federal Question: Federal Communications Act
Martin v. Live Oak County Jail
as 2:2022cv00260
Plaintiff:
Daniel Neal Martin
Defendant:
Live Oak County Jail, Daniel Coban Barton, Jailer Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02435
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ensley v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2022cv04255
Plaintiff:
Mark H. Ensley
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Warren Montgomery, Randy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Waybourn et al
as 4:2022cv00914
Plaintiff:
Maurice Henry Mason
Defendant:
Bill E. Waybourn, Tarrant County Sheriff, Mr. Iceom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Waybourn et al
as 4:2022cv00913
Petitioner:
Maurice Henry Mason
Respondent:
Bill E. Waybourn and Tarrant County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Harris County Jailer et al
as 4:2022cv03316
Plaintiff:
David Maurice Jackson
Defendant:
Harris County Jailer and Sgt T. Akidin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jackson v. Brown et al
as 4:2022cv03236
Plaintiff:
David Maurice Jackson
Defendant:
Cheryl Shook Brown, District Attorney 174th Court and Judge Hazel Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Riscky's Barbeque
as 4:2022cv00841
Plaintiff:
Maurice Henry Mason
Defendant:
Riscky's Barbeque
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
