Cases 31 - 40 of 88
Dickerson v. Byrd et al
as 5:2013cv00202
Plaintiff:
Richard Kerry Dickerson
Defendant:
Raymond Byrd, Raymond Briggs, Leroy Pitts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Byrd et al
as 5:2013cv00194
Plaintiff:
Erik Lamar Lewis
Defendant:
Raymond Byrd and Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carl Holder v. Raymond Byrd
as 13-60659
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARL HOLDER
Respondent - Appellee:
RAYMOND BYRD, Wilkinson County Correctional Facility, Warden
Caison v. Epps et al
as 5:2013cv00108
Plaintiff:
William Caison
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Raymond Byrd, James Holman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv00131
Plaintiff:
James Irvin Hill
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Christopher Epps, Raymond Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. King et al
as 5:2013cv00082
Plaintiff:
Latidtus Jones
Defendant:
Ron King, Hubert Davis, Brenda Sims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennis v. Byrd et al
as 5:2013cv00057
Plaintiff:
Darius Jarques Dennis
Defendant:
Raymond Byrd, Unknown Artist and Larry Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Chamber et al
as 5:2013cv00035
Plaintiff:
Tommy L. Hunter
Defendant:
Anita Chamber, B. Honeycutt and Raymond Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2013cv00017
Plaintiff:
Mark J. Allen
Defendant:
U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons, Corrections Corporation of America (C.C.A), Mississippi Department of Corrections (MDOC) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yankton v. Byrd
as 2:2012cv00240
Plaintiff:
LaVan Yankton
Defendant:
Raymond Byrd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
