Cases 31 - 40 of 165,430
Thompson v. The United States Of America
as 4:2024cv01892
Petitioner:
Charles Wendell Thompson
Respondent:
The United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hughes v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01897
Petitioner:
Darren Tramell Hughes
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gutierrez v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv01902
Petitioner:
Leonardo Gutierrez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Thompson v. Laurie Sue Baldwin et al
as 4:2024cv01904
Plaintiff:
Sidney Maurice Thompson, IV
Defendant:
Laurie Sue Baldwin, Marlon Thomas, Nueces Country Jail Correctional Officer Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patton v. USA
as 5:2024cv00078
Petitioner:
Heather Rochelle Patton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Sutherland v. USA
as 3:2024cv01219
Petitioner:
Joshua Sutherland
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01226
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00093
Petitioner:
Hendrick Darnell Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williamson v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Richard Williamson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Broadnax v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Marcus Derick Broadnax
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
