Cases 41 - 50 of 861
Woodberry v. Nail
as 5:2022cv05600
Plaintiff:
Derrick Woodberry
Defendant:
Lt Col Nail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv03819
Petitioner:
Derrick Isaiah Stewart
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Luckett v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2022cv00570
Plaintiff:
Derrick Darnell Luckett
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Chambers
as 1:2022cv00237
Plaintiff:
Demario Dontez Walker and Kiriyama Z. San Givonni
Defendant:
Derrick Chambers
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Warden, FCI El Reno
as 5:2022cv00238
Petitioner:
Derrick Thomas
Respondent:
Warden, FCI El Reno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Estes v. USA
as 2:2022cv03991
Petitioner:
Derrick Estes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate
Turner v. Besler et al
as 6:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Joseph Turner
Defendant:
Nathan Besler, Rick Boone, Kelly Janica and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maxie v. Warden
as 5:2022cv01832
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jerome Maxie
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moffite v. Huffman
as 3:2022cv00289
Plaintiff:
Derrick Dewayne Moffite
Defendant:
Bland Huffman
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rudzavice et al v. Wilson et al
as 4:2021cv00176
Plaintiff:
Justin D. Regan, Henry David Jackson, Nicholas Hamm and others
Defendant:
B.P. Waller, Eric Wilson and S. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
