Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Garza v. Rodriguez, et al
as 08-10319
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GUADALUPE GARZA
Defendant - Appellee:
DELBERT R RODRIGUEZ, Preston E Smith Unit, FRED C EARLY, Preston E Smith Unit, JAMES C RAMSEY, Preston E Smith Unit and others
Hawkins v. Adams et al
as 5:2008cv00077
Plaintiff:
Clarence Edward Hawkins
Defendant:
John Adams, Fred Early and Belinda Parks
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Murphy v. Barrientes et al
as 5:2007cv00171
Plaintiff:
David Murphy
Defendant:
Emilio Barrientes, Fred Early and David Fondren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Early v. Martin et al
as 1:2007cv00127
Defendant:
Calvin Martin, Jack Diekens and State of Texas
Plaintiff:
Arthur F Early
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Early v. Diekens et al
as 1:2007cv00128
Plaintiff:
Arthur F Early
Defendant:
Jack Diekens, Carolyn Haven, Martha Walke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Early v. City Parish of East Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2007cv00406
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Early
Defendant:
City Parish of East Baton Rouge, Melvin Kip Holden and Greg Phares
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Early v. Martin et al
as 1:2007cv00104
Plaintiff:
Arthur F Early
Defendant:
Calvin Martin, Santiago, Abilene Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garza v. Rodriguez et al
as 5:2007cv00074
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Garza
Defendant:
Delbert R Rodriguez, Fred C Early, James C Ramsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bibbs v. Early, et al
as 07-10452
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUAREZ MIGUEL BIBBS
Defendant - Appellee:
LESLIE EARLY, JAMIE BURKHOLDER and RICHARD GIBSON
Garza v. Adams et al
as 5:2007cv00057
Plaintiff:
Thomas A Garza
Defendant:
John H Adams, Fred C Early and David F Fondren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
