Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Chavez v. Montogmery County et al
as 4:2013cv01919
Petitioner:
Jacob Chavez
Respondent:
Montogmery County, Sheriff Tommy Gage, Sr. Sgt. Kurtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Freeman v. Gage et al
as 4:2013cv01784
Plaintiff:
Toriano Freeman
Defendant:
Thomas Gage and Montgomery County Jail Unknown Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brent Fields v. Tommy Gage, et al
as 13-20306
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRENT VONCEY FIELDS
Defendant - Appellee:
TOMMY GAGE, Sheriff, in and for Montgomery County Texas and MAGGI CARMICHAEL, Open Record Division Management for Montgomery County Sheriff's Office
Fields v. Gage et al
as 4:2013cv01066
Plaintiff:
Brent Voncey Fields
Defendant:
Tommy Gage and Maggi Carmichael
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cowart v. Officer D. Lavergne et al
as 4:2013cv00396
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey C. Cowart
Defendant:
Officer D. Lavergne and Tommy Gage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gage v. Cain et al
as 3:2012cv00607
Defendant:
Burl Cain, Gerry Lane and James LeBlanc
Plaintiff:
Harold Gage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Gage v. Burl Cain, Warden
as 12-30803
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER JOHN GAGE
Respondent - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Westerman v. Bell et al
as 1:2012cv00396
Defendant:
Ivy Anderson, Oliver J. Bell, Amand Gage and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Claude Westerman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gage v. Cain
as 2:2012cv01054
Plaintiff:
Christopher John Gage
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gage v. Cain et al
as 3:2012cv00119
Defendant:
K. Benjamin, Unknown Bonnette, Unknown Butler and others
Plaintiff:
Harold Wayne Gage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
