Cases 41 - 50 of 911
Damian v. Cause No 92897-CR et al
as 4:2022cv04035
Plaintiff:
Gilbert S Damian
Defendant:
Cause No 92897-CR, Robert Miller, Phil Moria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grizzle v. Texas Tech Medical Branch et al
as 5:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
Robert Grizzle
Defendant:
Texas Tech Medical Branch, Bryan Williams, Jim Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trevino v. Bastrop County, et al.
as 1:2022cv01204
Plaintiff:
Michael Vallejo Trevino
Defendant:
Bastrop County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff Maurice Cook, Ms. P O'Grady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silvas v. Sergeant Yabrough et al
as 4:2022cv03977
Plaintiff:
Julian G Silvas
Defendant:
Sergeant Yabrough, Sergeant Gmotomasi and Sergeant Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinson v. Dallas County Jail & Associates et al
as 3:2022cv02317
Plaintiff:
Tahj Pinson
Defendant:
Dallas County Jail & Associates, FNU Miller, FNU Saurez and others
Interested Party:
Marian Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Desmarais v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2022cv03622
Plaintiff:
John P. Desmarais
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Gene Miller, Debra Booker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garms v. Miller et al
as 1:2022cv00144
Plaintiff:
Jason Berna Garms
Defendant:
Edward Miller, Molly Henry and C.J. Pate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Deleon v. Miller
as 5:2022cv00251
Petitioner:
Rocky Deleon
Respondent:
Michael R. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Jumper
as 5:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
John A Miller
Defendant:
Larkin Jumper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matthews v. Miller
as 1:2022cv00330
Plaintiff:
Earnest J. Matthews
Defendant:
Patricia Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
