Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Anthony Pitre v. James LeBlanc
as 10-30778
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY C. PITRE
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES LEBLANC, Warden, C. Paul Phelps Correctional Center
Bridget v. C Paul Phelps Correctional Center et al
as 6:2010cv01226
Plaintiff:
Allen Bridget
Defendant:
Warden C Paul Phelps Correctional Center and State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Oliver v. Phelps Correctional Center
as 2:2010cv00728
Plaintiff:
Brian D. Oliver
Defendant:
Phelps Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Armant v. Stalder, et al
as 09-30027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE ARMANT
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD STALDER, STEVE RADER, WARDEN, C PAUL PHELPS CORRECTIONAL CENTER, JAMES LEBLANC, Warden and others
lundahl v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 4:2008cv03786
Plaintiff:
Holli Lundahl
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Paul Brown, L White and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pitre v. C Paul Phelps Correctional Center
as 6:2008cv01831
Plaintiff:
Anthony C Pitre
Defendant:
Warden C Paul Phelps Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lundahl v. United States of America et al
as 3:2008cv01990
Petitioner:
Holli Telford Lundahl
Defendant:
United States of America, FMC-Carswell, R. E. Gregg and others
Amicu:
Law Offices of Morris Polich and Purdy
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Hedge v. Warden C Paul Phelps
as 08-30888
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRYL GILBERT EDWARD HEDGE
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN C PAUL PHELPS CORRECTIONAL CENTER, also known as Robert Henderson
Burnes v. Rogers
as 08-30900
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHNNIE BURNES
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES ROGERS, WARDEN, C PAUL PHELPS CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Warren v. Crowe et al
as 2:2008cv04038
Plaintiff:
Nathan Warren
Defendant:
Bobby Crowe, Tim Phelps, Probation & Parole and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
