Cases 51 - 60 of 1,536
Dickerson v. TDCJ director C & D et al
as 3:2023cv02283
Plaintiff:
Terry Dickerson
Defendant:
TDCJ director C & D, Brandon Birmingham, Sarah Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wernecke, Jr v. Andrews
as 1:2023cv01216
Petitioner:
Fred Walter Wernecke, Jr
Respondent:
Matt Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rios v. Archer County Sheriff's Office
as 7:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Archer County Sheriff's Office, Jack Curd, Justin Perron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wernecke, Jr v. Andrews DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERED OUT.
as 7:2023cv00337
Petitioner:
Fred Walter Wernecke, Jr
Respondent:
Matt Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Allen v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03724
Petitioner:
William Andrew Allen
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hubbard v. Sollie et al
as 3:2023cv02958
Plaintiff:
Andrew Chandler Hubbard
Defendant:
Sheriff Billie Sollie and Lauderdale County
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. State of Texas
as 4:2023cv03654
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03653
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Burke v. Fagan
as 4:2023cv03617
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Respondent:
Sheriff Eric Fagan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker et al v. Collier et al
as 1:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Matthew Baker, Robert Andrews, Timothy Cone and others
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Oscar Mendoza, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
