Cases 51 - 60 of 187
Bishop v. Samuels et al
as 5:2015cv01782
Plaintiff:
Daniel-Ralph Bishop
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Jr, Jeffrey Grondolsky, J L Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elvis Roberts v. Jerry Revell, et al
as 15-10374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELVIS DEAN ROBERTS
Defendant - Appellee:
TOMMY L. NORWOOD, JOSEPH EASTRIDGE and MARY J. ROBERTSON
Williams v. Jones et al
as 4:2015cv00775
Plaintiff:
Randall Williams
Defendant:
Warden Jones, Warden Smith, Jamie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Baker v. State of Texas, et al
as 15-50108
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY NORWOOD BAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, RICK PERRY, Governor, State of Texas and GREG ABBOTT, Attorney General, State of Texas
Moehle v. Wathen et al
as 7:2015cv00023
Plaintiff:
Patrick Henry Moehle
Defendant:
Robert Wathen, James Anders and Tommy Norwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutherland v. Stephens et al
as 4:2015cv00316
Plaintiff:
Ronald David Sutherland
Defendant:
William Stephens, Smith, Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Doty et al
as 7:2015cv00022
Plaintiff:
Larry Dale Williams
Defendant:
Lawrence Doty, Richard Wathen, Tommy Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Sawyer v. Director TDCJ-CID, et al
as 14-11174
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS SAWYER
Defendant - Appellee:
DIRECTOR TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, DAVID POTTER, Doctor Allred Unit, RICHARD E. WATHEN, Warden Allred Unit and others
Norwood v. Caldwell
as 3:2014cv00595
Respondent:
James D Buddy Caldwell
Petitioner:
Everette Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moehle v. Stephens et al
as 4:2014cv01350
Plaintiff:
Patrick Henry Moehle
Defendant:
Robert Wathen, James Anders and Tommy Norwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
