Cases 61 - 70 of 12,597
Perkins v. Steen et al
as 5:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Jason Perkins
Defendant:
Daniel Steen, FNU Peyan, Erin Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Collier et al
as 4:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
William Dexter White and George Edward Tustin, Jr
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, C.F. Hazelwood, Garthe Parker and others
Interested Party:
Joseph J Genovesi and Jason David Sheedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prestage v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
William Allen Prestage
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rojas v. Mogannan et al
as 3:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Julio Cesar Rojas
Defendant:
Kyli Mogannan and FNV Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. McMillian et al
as 1:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Hilyerd Williams
Defendant:
Randy McMillian, J. Losoya, Christopher Duggan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herrera v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
William Charles Herrera
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
White v. Lumpkin
as 24-40119
Petitioner:
William Dexter White
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Roby v. MDOC et al
as 4:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Oscar Roby
Defendant:
MDOC, MS William and MS Shorts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Lumpkin
as 2:2024cv00051
Petitioner:
Darrell Anthony Williams
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Unknown Defendants
as 2:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Dremayne Williams
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
