Cases 61 - 70 of 71
Blackmon v. Quarterman et al
as 6:2009cv00249
Plaintiff:
Darrell Blackmon
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman and Record Department of TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craig Blackmon v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 08-20808
Petitioner - Appellant:
CRAIG BLACKMON
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Blackmon v. Quarterman et al
as 4:2008cv03440
Plaintiff:
Eugene Blackmon
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman and Joni White
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Blackmon v. Kukua et al
as 4:2008cv02449
Plaintiff:
Eugene Blackmon
Defendant:
Kukua, Exiquio Garza and Mark Garza
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Blackmon v. Kukua et al
as 2:2008cv00273
Plaintiff:
Eugene Blackmon
Defendant:
Kukua, Exiquio Garza, Mark Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackmon v. Quarterman, et al
as 08-20132
Petitioner - Appellant:
EUGENE BLACKMON
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Blackmon v. State Of Texas
as 2:2008cv00035
Petitioner:
Craig Blackmon
Respondent:
State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blackmon v. Quarterman
as 4:2008cv00386
Petitioner:
Craig Blackmon
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blackmon v. Chaney Do Not Docket - Case Transferred to 4:08cv320.
as 2:2008cv00026
Petitioner:
Eugene Blackmon
Respondent:
B Chaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blackmon v. Chaney
as 4:2008cv00320
Petitioner:
Eugene Blackmon
Respondent:
B Chaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
