Cases 71 - 80 of 6,236
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 3:2024cv00805
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No named respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edgett v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Hudson L. Edgett and Hudson Lynn Edget
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Ward et al
as 7:2024cv00027
Defendant:
Heather W. Pederson, Ingrid Y. Ward, Gregory S. Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
James E Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tyner v. Unit Grievance Dept.
as 7:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Rayland L. Tyner
Defendant:
Unit Grievance Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Smith
as 6:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Corey L Johnson
Defendant:
Gerald Jerome Smith, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunez v. Enge
as 3:2024cv00405
Petitioner:
Victor Gabriel Nunez
Respondent:
Jamadre L Enge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hollingsworth v. Attorney General of State of Mississippi
as 1:2024cv00020
Petitioner:
Kendrick L. Hollingsworth
Respondent:
Attorney General of State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duggins v. Pacheco et al
as 2:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
David Randall Duggins
Defendant:
Daniel V Pacheco, Thomas L Stevens and Traina L Slack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. John Doe 7:24-CV-26-O
as 7:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Deunverelle L. Jackson and Deunjerelle L. Jackson
Defendant:
John Doe 7:24-CV-26-O, Katherine Rushing and Myriah Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carbajal v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00049
Petitioner:
Jorge L. Carbajal
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
